Comments on: Argument from Personal Incredulity http://www.suburbanadventure.com/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/ Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:18:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Sir Putts-a-lot http://www.suburbanadventure.com/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/comment-page-1/#comment-126 Sir Putts-a-lot Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:59:18 +0000 http://www.suburbanadventure.com/wordpress/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/#comment-126 Is that in ASCII? If so, I shall. Is that in ASCII? If so, I shall.

]]> By: Sir Putts-a-lot http://www.suburbanadventure.com/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/comment-page-1/#comment-131 Sir Putts-a-lot Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:59:18 +0000 http://www.suburbanadventure.com/wordpress/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/#comment-131 Is that in ASCII? If so, I shall. Is that in ASCII? If so, I shall.

]]> By: Terry Robinson http://www.suburbanadventure.com/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/comment-page-1/#comment-125 Terry Robinson Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:53:37 +0000 http://www.suburbanadventure.com/wordpress/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/#comment-125 Please, Sir. With exclamation marks, it's one or none. I strongly recommend you use the interrobang next time. Please, Sir. With exclamation marks, it’s one or none. I strongly recommend you use the interrobang next time.

]]> By: Terry Robinson http://www.suburbanadventure.com/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/comment-page-1/#comment-130 Terry Robinson Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:53:37 +0000 http://www.suburbanadventure.com/wordpress/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/#comment-130 Please, Sir. With exclamation marks, it's one or none. I strongly recommend you use the interrobang next time. Please, Sir. With exclamation marks, it’s one or none. I strongly recommend you use the interrobang next time.

]]> By: Sir Putts-a-lot http://www.suburbanadventure.com/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/comment-page-1/#comment-124 Sir Putts-a-lot Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:36:49 +0000 http://www.suburbanadventure.com/wordpress/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/#comment-124 CAN'T ANYONE SPELL RIDICULOUS!?!? CAN’T ANYONE SPELL RIDICULOUS!?!?

]]> By: Sir Putts-a-lot http://www.suburbanadventure.com/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/comment-page-1/#comment-129 Sir Putts-a-lot Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:36:49 +0000 http://www.suburbanadventure.com/wordpress/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/#comment-129 CAN'T ANYONE SPELL RIDICULOUS!?!? CAN’T ANYONE SPELL RIDICULOUS!?!?

]]> By: Terry Robinson http://www.suburbanadventure.com/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/comment-page-1/#comment-123 Terry Robinson Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:18:25 +0000 http://www.suburbanadventure.com/wordpress/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/#comment-123 It can be, but that's usually the argument from consequences which states that something must be true because the outcome is good or something is false because the outcome is good. Also, using some formal fallacies, we can deduce that women don't poop. For instance, Men poop Women are not men or simply not-men From the law of identity, if women pooped, they'd be indifferent from men and thus to preserve the order of the universe: not-men must not poop. We can also commit another fallacy by assuming absence of evidence is evidence of absence. I've never seen a women poop, thus they must not. It can be, but that’s usually the argument from consequences which states that something must be true because the outcome is good or something is false because the outcome is good.

Also, using some formal fallacies, we can deduce that women don’t poop. For instance,
Men poop
Women are not men or simply not-men
From the law of identity, if women pooped, they’d be indifferent from men and thus to preserve the order of the universe:
not-men must not poop.

We can also commit another fallacy by assuming absence of evidence is evidence of absence. I’ve never seen a women poop, thus they must not.

]]> By: Terry Robinson http://www.suburbanadventure.com/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/comment-page-1/#comment-128 Terry Robinson Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:18:25 +0000 http://www.suburbanadventure.com/wordpress/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/#comment-128 It can be, but that's usually the argument from consequences which states that something must be true because the outcome is good or something is false because the outcome is good. Also, using some formal fallacies, we can deduce that women don't poop. For instance, Men poop Women are not men or simply not-men From the law of identity, if women pooped, they'd be indifferent from men and thus to preserve the order of the universe: not-men must not poop. We can also commit another fallacy by assuming absence of evidence is evidence of absence. I've never seen a women poop, thus they must not. It can be, but that’s usually the argument from consequences which states that something must be true because the outcome is good or something is false because the outcome is good.

Also, using some formal fallacies, we can deduce that women don’t poop. For instance,
Men poop
Women are not men or simply not-men
From the law of identity, if women pooped, they’d be indifferent from men and thus to preserve the order of the universe:
not-men must not poop.

We can also commit another fallacy by assuming absence of evidence is evidence of absence. I’ve never seen a women poop, thus they must not.

]]> By: J O E http://www.suburbanadventure.com/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/comment-page-1/#comment-122 J O E Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:13:41 +0000 http://www.suburbanadventure.com/wordpress/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/#comment-122 Would not believing in something because the thought of it is icky (i.e. girls don't poop, even though its rediculous for that to be true) count? and for the record, girls plant flowers or something far less icky then poop, i mean c'mon. Would not believing in something because the thought of it is icky (i.e. girls don’t poop, even though its rediculous for that to be true) count? and for the record, girls plant flowers or something far less icky then poop, i mean c’mon.

]]> By: J O E http://www.suburbanadventure.com/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/comment-page-1/#comment-127 J O E Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:13:41 +0000 http://www.suburbanadventure.com/wordpress/2008/01/24/argument-from-personal-incredulity/#comment-127 Would not believing in something because the thought of it is icky (i.e. girls don't poop, even though its rediculous for that to be true) count? and for the record, girls plant flowers or something far less icky then poop, i mean c'mon. Would not believing in something because the thought of it is icky (i.e. girls don’t poop, even though its rediculous for that to be true) count? and for the record, girls plant flowers or something far less icky then poop, i mean c’mon.

]]>